For me, Mayan culture has always been the most fascinating of all the ancient enigmatic civilizations. The mystical and Alien nature of the artifacts they left behind is unlike anything else you’ll find in the historic and archeological record. Some of these Stelae seriously look like representations of alien robots and futuristic flight machines or spacecraft.
Just what on earth was really going on here? You cannot tell me that we aren’t looking at something technological and/or possibly magical/alchemical in nature. Just the site of some of the shockingly modern-looking statues, Stelae and carvings found in the ancient city Copan alone is enough to jarr you to the core and leave you in awe and astonishment. What on earth was really going on within these cities?
COPAN, Guatemala(Below)
The Olmec and the artifacts like the giant heads and enormous basalt columns they left behind at sites like Tres Zapotes and La Venta are quite the enigma and another bizarre anomaly in their own right.
You have to keep in mind that all these Mayan cities were in an antiquated and ruined state already by the time the Spanish arrived in Mesoamerica and South America in the early 1500’s. The Aztec and Inca civilizations represented the prevailing contemporary inhabiting cultures in power at the time in the new world and even they had little information to provide about their predecessors and how some of these ruins were actually built and by whom exactly. They attributed the construction of many of the larger and oldest sites to the gods and to Giants in some cases when asked by Conquistadors who built these places. Teotihuacan, Machu Pichu, Sacsayhuaman and Puma Punka were all large sites all found in ruins all the way back in antiquity and had all been abandoned with no real known provenance to speak of.
Even today we have very little inkling as to what was going on at some of these sites outside of the same baseless and unoriginal speculative musings from lamestream archaeologists who incessantly spew the same old and illogical theories at nauseum about who the real builders of these sites were and when they were built. A mainstream academic cabal that never brings any new research or insights to the table, perpetuating a cycle that amounts to nothing more than an endless peer-reviewed circle jerk session where all the participants have the same lazy and unfounded general thesis on the history of these ancient Megalithic sites, who built them and how. No matter how preposterous and baseless their conclusions are. They will tell you that the Inca built all the Megalithic structures you see in Cusco and across Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador despite admitting that the Inca were a Bronze age culture that lacked the technical ability to cut and move the massive Megalithic stones used to construct countless structures that can be seen all across the spanse of sacred valley and beyond. They will tell you that the Aymara Indians were responsible for building Puma Punku and that they cut, shaped and moved the massive precision cut stones that are found scattered across the Tiwanaku and Puma Punku archaeological complex using nothing but chicken bones and copper chisels. How can academia be allowed to make assertions like these and force these opinions upon the rest of the community while allowing that kind of laughable nonsense to be recorded as the official mainstream hypothesis of the University or Institution they represent and even printed inside of textbooks, all without any repercussions to speak of?
The Megalithic ruins of Puma Punku, BOLIVIA
City of Tiwanaku, BOLIVIA
Megalithic walls found at Sacsayhuaman & Machu Pichu, PERU
You don’t need to be an expert in archeology or engineering to deduce that many of these official mainstream stances are nonsense. But nothing has changed and they still teach garbage like that in Anthropology classes across the globe to this day. It’s left to the independent researchers on the internet to conduct rational inquiries and hold real discussions about the fallacies of logic that still exist within many of the mainstream premises of certain archeological paradigms still taught by Academic institutions. Universities that are meant to be the authorities responsible for establishing the highest of quality research about our history and yet consistently fail to do so and instead bend to the whim of systemic truth subversion that acts to disregard certain inconvenient truths about ancient civilizations that any honest academic inquiry would inevitably produce. The establishment goes to great lengths to hide the truth about the true history of our planet. A great example of this was the drama that ensued and the hissy fit the FCC threw in response to NBC’s airing of the special “The Mysterious Origins of Man”, based on the book by Michael Cremo, which happened all the way back in 1996:
…in 1996 when NBC aired its special The Mysterious Origins of Man, hosted by Charlton Heston, and featured the book(by Michael Cremo), establishment scientists felt so threatened by this program that they lobbied the Federal Communications Commission to censure and fine NBC for airing it (read the complete story in Forbidden Archeology’s Impact).
For a simple TV special to garner that kind of a response from a Federal regulatory body like the FCC just proves just how serious and centralized in its enforcement the overall agenda is to actively censor the truth about our history. They weren’t playing. Kudos to NBC for standing on free speech and telling the FCC to f-off. They paid all that money to produce that thing and even went as far as to get the great Charleston Heston to host and narrate the project. They weren’t about to shelve it for no one. Plus they knew it was damn good programming and that people would watch it. And they sure did.
It’s nice to see that Google invited Michael Cremo to be a “Google Talk” guest to speak about this back in 2014. Things have obviously changed a bit since 1996. The internet became an unstoppable force for promoting truth by allowing for the assimilation of honest discourse without the filtering out of dissident opinions. The censoring of alternative lines of reasoning by the same college Professors who actively Gatekeep certain paradigms within specific areas of archaeological research. The same opinions repeated year after year by freshly cloned PHD students taught by these same Gatekeeper Professors. These become the next generation of archaeologist who generally lack any useful creative faculties or aptitude for independent critical thought. Robotic graduate student drones who are bred by the institutions to carry-on the same paradigms and to reinforce the peer-review echo chamber designed to quarantine, copy and then repeat the same senseless archaeological conclusions and promote the same general “expert opinions” supposedly held within that specific field of study or area of interest. Stagnating any possibility for the emergence of any fresh opinions that would threaten to uncover so many of the uncomfortable historical truths that they’ve so vigilently buried beneath the piles of lies that these institutions have stood on since the very inception of the academic disciplines and programs that they’ve been tenured to be the warden and Gatekeeper of.
https://m.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=Vlad9vt+mexico
The Maya and Olmec cultures are very similar stylistically to ancient Cambodian, Indian, and Indonesian art, and also draw parallels stylistically to Chinese, Japanese and Korean artistic motifs. In many instances you wouldn’t even be able to tell the difference when comparing side by side certain Hindu and Balinise works with Mayan artwork. They are nearly identical in so many regards. The same goes for the architectural style of the pyramidal structures both cultures erected. Some of the temples found in Indonesia(Bali & Java specifically), Cambodia and Thailand are totally interchangeable with Mayan architecture with no discernible differences between them. The way both cultures happened to worship and even the style in which they depicted the feathered serpent diety in Bali and Mesoamerica are also essentially identical.
https://www.bibhudevmisra.com/2016/08/olmec-yogis-with-hindu-beliefs-did-they.html?m=1
Source: https://www.tamilbrahmins.com/threads/amazing-similarities-between-mayas-and-hindu-nagas.8749/
Amazing Similarities between Mayas and Hindu Nagas (The first part of this article is Are Mayas, Indian Nagas?)
1. Strange co incidence: Kali Yuga 3102 BC and Maya Yuga beginning 3114 BC
2. Maya appearance: Maya people of Central America look exactly like Manippur or Nagaland people.
3. Maya architecture resembled Pallava and South East Asian monuments
4. Justifying their name NAGAS (Sanskrit name for snake) Snake Symbol is found every wherein Naga buildings.
5. “Maya”– was the divine architect in Hindu mythology. Justifying the name Maya, we see a lot of huge buildings in the Maya countries Mexico, Honduras, Belize and Guatemala.
6. 1000 pillar mandap is mentioned in Vedas and it is found in Madurai and other places. We hear about 1000 pillar mandap in Chichen Itza at the tip of Yucatan peninsula.
7.Patchouli is a game played by both Mayas and Indians
8.Tamil word catamaran is used in Mexico, where Mayas flourished for centuries.
9. Migration Route: Sri Lanka-South East Asia—Central America—South America was the Nga migratory route. All these places are called Naka Loka (Nagaland) in Tamil and Sanskrit literature.
Indus river port Patala was used for travel to the countries down below Indian peninsula and so they were called Patala Loka.
10. Nagas are mentioned in Vedas ( Pancavimsa Brahmana–iv.9,4 ) and they are an ancient race.
11. Nagas in Nala Damayanthi story in Mahabharata and Sangam Tamil literature mention special type of clothes made by the Nagas.
12. Over twenty Naga poets composed Tamil poems which were in the Tamil Sangam anthology.
13. Sri Lanka Nagas and SE Asia Nagas freely mingled with Non Naga races. Agastya Rishi married a Naga princes by name Yasomati in South East Asia. Rig Vedic Agastya was different who married Lopamudra, a princess of Vidharba.( Vedic civilization spread far south beyond Vidharba during Rig Vedic days. This explodes the Westerner’s myth of Aryan-Dravidian divisions).
14.Mahabharata period Nagas married their women to Arjuna (Ulupi and Chitrangatha) One of them is a Tamil also known as Miss Alli Rani.
15. Lord Krishna was Anti Naga and Indra was Pro Naga, according to Hindu scriptures.
16. Krishna’s two clashes with Nagas: Khandava Vana (Gondwana land) and Kaliya Marthan (dancing on the head of a snake)
17. Arjuna’s grandson Parikshit’s assassination culminated in the migration of Nagas outside India.
18. Janamejayan’s massacre was stopped by the good offices of Astika and Jaratkaru.
19.Brahmin’s peace deal was worked out on the banks of Narmadha (Mahismati) and Brahmins remember this every day in their Sandhyavandana Mantra.
20. The Padma Purana says of the seven infernal regions Mahatala, Rasatala and Patala are occupied by Nagas and Danavas. The suffix ATL in many Naga names may be ATALA.
21. Paramapatha Sopana Patam/picture is a Snake and Ladder game played by Tamils and Telugus, where in all the Naga leader pictures are drawn.
22.Ophir—Oviyar— Chitra—Painter– is another name of Nagas. Probably they wore Tattoos of snakes on their bodies. Ophites (snake worshippers) is mentioned in Greek literature. Hippolytus and Clement of Alexandria mention this sect.
Sarpa Rakja (Rani) is mentioned in Pancha Vimsa Brahmana. Aligi and Viligi are mentioned in Atharva Veda. Aligi and Viligi are found in Sumerian clay tablets. They may be Nagas/Mayas. Probably Krishna devotees wanted to ridicule them by depicting them as snakes with their names written. When one reaches a snake square by rolling the dices, the player gets negative points and go to the bottom of the board.
23. American born Swami B. V. Tripurari asks, “What mysterious psychological law would have caused Asians, and Americans to both use the umbrella as a sign of royalty, to invent the same games, imagine similar cosmologies, and attribute the same colours to the different directions?”
Hindus and Mayas use umbrella as a royal symbol which is mentioned in Sangam Tamil literature and Sanskrit literature in thousands of places.
Hindus, Jains, Buddhists attribute four different colours to East, South, West and North. Mayas follow it.Maya colours :East-red, South- yellow, West- black, North- white. It is slightly different from Buddhists and Hindus. Shiva’s five faces are attributed with colours. Buddhists colours for directions was even mentioned by a Muslim traveller like Albiruni. Mahabharata attributes four colours for four Yugas (white,yellow,red and black).
23.a) Sanskrit Names for Towns: Guatemala =Gauthama alaya; Tiwanaku= Deva Naga;Tikal=Trikala,Teotihuachan=Deva Takshan,Mitla=Mithila, Orinoco= Ori Nagan, Machu Pichu= Macha Pucham (exactly looking like fish wall. There is one more place with the same name in the Himalayas/Nepal, Jaina Island, Mani, Copan= Sopana,Cholula=Chola,Aryballus= Arya Bala, Chetumal=Ketumala Dwipa=Guatemala,Aztec=Astika (Rishi who saved Nagas). Loads of Sanskrit and Tamil names can be derived by a patient researcher. We can justify it by observing waves of migrations. Tula, Yacatehctli (Yaga Deva Thali) Yaxchilan (Yaksha Seelan) also sound like Sanskrit names.
24. Over seventeen Egyptian kings who lived 3500 years ago had the same title Ramses.It may be Rama Seshan (Vishnu) or Ramesan (Shiva). Egyptian pharaohs Ramses heads are decorated with snake like Lord Shiva’s head. Vishnu had it (snake Adi Seshan) as his bed.
25. Swastika, elephant, lotus: Hindu motifs lotus, Swastika and elephant are found in Maya sculptures. Americas have not got elephants. Millions of years ago mammoths only roamed American north.
26. Maya God Quetza coatl (Plumed Serpent) may be a distorted word meaning Garuda Sathru (enemy of eagle).
27. Fire is Born: One of the kings who ruled around 378 AD is translated as Fire is born. Draupadi, Rajashani Chauhans and Cheras and Velirs of Tamil Nadu say that they were are Fire born. They belong to Agni Kula. Nagas may belong to Agni kula.
28. The Maya king who ruled around 700 AD is called Kan Maxx which is nothing but Maha Nakan/ great snake (Kan is snake in Mayan language, Na(kan), Maxx is Maha)
Palenque (Tamil word Palingu): One of the town names is Palengue. There is a stone temple which looks like marble temple. Palingu is a Tamil word for Marble, Mirror, Crystal etc. Ther eis no doubt that Tamil Nagas also were part of the migration. One of the twenty Tamil Naga poets is Maruthan Ila Nagan who has contributed a lot.
29.The very script of Mayas is round which looks like Palalva Grantha.
Discover more from Fringe Culture
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Leave a Reply