Just how old are these structures in reality? I’ve always had my suspicions about Abu Simbel, but could the famous Gizan pyramid trio of Kufu(Cheops), Kafre and Menkaure also be 17th/18th century constructions, long passed off as the work of the dynastic and/or Archaic Egyptians? I say yes and no.
They lie to us about everything else regarding the Old World. Why would this paradigm be excluded from controller manipulation? The same way ancient Rome was fabricated in order fill in the extra 1000 years that has been added to our currently accepted historical timeline, the dynastic Egypt era and the building projects attributed to all those Pharoahs could have also been synthetically inserted into “his●STORY●line”.
Now I’m not saying that literally every single solitary ruined building in all of the damn land of Egypt was built semi recently, all within last few hundred years. Of course not. In fact I would argue that there are many sites that are many multiple times older than the oldest officially claimed sites along the banks of the Egyptian and Sudanese Kushite Nile riverbank(ancient Khem). But I have to wonder just how many of the more famous sites have had both their timeline and historical context misrepresented in both directions in regards to their age. Manipulated by the mafiosa’esque posse of bullies otherwise known as mainstream Egyptologists who have not only messed with the credibility of the site’s antquity but have also physically compromised the historical accuracy in the way they’ve purposefully rebuilt them incorrectly to misrepresent their context for the tourists.
Most Egyptologists are attention-seeking drama Queens who posture themselves as the sole authority on any and all historical, anthropological and archeological inquisitions on the vast array of archeological sites and the culture behind the dynastic eras. Ruins and peoples that in most cases have had their backstory and circumstantial historical details fabricated entirely. With much of what remains today having already been heavily renovated, reinterpreted and hastily meddled with, completely arbitrarily, and then rebuilt in colonial times using little but guess work in a far from professional and highly speculative modus of operation. All so long as the conclusions end up fitting the desired narrative already put forward by the annointed archeologists and historians in the field. While at the same time also conveniently acting to hide away any specific details within the remains that could possibly reveal certain technological characteristics within the engineering of the complexes and/or expose the presence of certain artifacts that could have shed more light about the anomalous nature of these old world constructions. Secrets they go to especially great lengths to keep from us.
It’s not much of a secret that modern Egyptology barely even represents a valid scientific field and is a full blown circus and cult-clown-like side show of “pyram-IDIOTS” who belch out and parrot the same tacky theological musings and grandiose assumptions backed-up by NOTHING. It’s snobbily-tenured members bombastically and arrogantly postulate an array of antiquated and laughably ridiculous notions amongst themselves about the ancient Egyptian world. A fantasyland they’ve created for themselves to frolick around within that’s not based on any solid anthropological or archaeological academic foundry to speak of.
Their favorite wad of monkey shit to spew at nauseum is their neverending assertions that the pyramids were tombs for the Pharoahs, despite there never having been a mummy found inside any pyramid anywhere in Egypt.
I’m pretty sure they fake hieroglyphics on the reg to this very day and that many of their most “sensational discoveries” like the King Tutenkhamen burial hoard are in reality colonial forgeries and were straight up planted and faked to prop up their falsified narratives about dynastic Egypt and to help fill in the gaps in their fabricated timelines.
Everyone knows that nearly all the Pharoic mummies were found in the valley of the kings and NOT within any chamber inside of any pyramid. But that doesn’t stop the Mark Lehner’s and Zahwi Hawass’s of the world from continuously putting these falsehoods out there for public consumption. And even a lot of finds within the Valley of the king are definite forgeries in my opinion so it’s all just one big pile of made up shit. That’s Egyptology for ya.
There were however a few apparently legitimate finds of royal mummies with their accompanying eye-popping treasure hoards that were dug up outside of the valley of the kings in Tannis and Saqqara. But those cases were the outliers, not the norm and still weren’t examples of mummies being found inside any pyramid. These were just examples of finds that might have actually been legitimate ancient artifacts in my opinion.
But that doesn’t stop Egyptologists from continuing to go hard in the paint with the paradigm that the pyramids were tombs for dynastic Pharohs.
Back to when the pyramids could have been built…
We have no issue attributing all the amazing old world cathedrals and World’s Fair buildings to the semi recent “Tartarians”. So it wouldn’t be that much of a stretch for us to also infer that this same civilization could have been responsible for erecting the pyramids back in the 17 or 1800s to be used as power plants or vibrational resonance devices or solar-hydro-enrichment facilities of some kind.
I still think that Wise Up is right about many ancient pyramids not actually having been pyramids and were just rebuilt that way by archeologists Any standard rectangular building will look like a pyramid mound after collapsing and most of these ruins we see are actually just the roofs of very tall buildings poking it’s head out the ground with most of the structure actuall buried deep below and most of it hidden far below out of sight.
Personally, I think that it’s possible that underneath the first layer of blocks on the great pyramid is possibly the remnants of a hidden super machine comprised of wildly advanced antiquitechnology.
You can see some of these mega blocks exposed in certain areas of the pyramid where the first layer of blocks is peeled back, exposing the inner core.
This AntiquiTech that many of these buildings were equipped with is something they might have gone to great lengths in post-mudflood times to cover up the bulk of across the planet via different renovation strategies.
Buildings like the great pyramid are likely just one of many with such hidden features that were renovated and added onto later on in order to cover up what they originally looked like which would have given away the most apparent and obvious technological facets of the original machine underneath.
Wise Up puts out some amazing evidence that shows that the entire Giza plateau is one gigantic ruined foundational footprint of what was once a huge ancient city of skyscrapers. Literally all the sand in the region is the leftover rubble from these old concrete buildings. It’s crazy. I picked out his videos on Egypt and put them below for you all.
Discover more from Fringe Culture
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Leave a Reply