They Are ALL Snakes in the Grass | What is a “GATEKEEPER”? Today’s Persuasive Conservative Gatekeepers & the Paradigms They Hide & Defend

Always remember: THEY ALL WORK TOGETHER

Bet you didn’t know Tucker Carlson was a VIP AT COMET PING PONG. How about Trump being involved with the KKK and all over the place with kids at Epstein Island? Just because Trump took out a bunch of his rivals in the name of child trafficking in order to appear to have a valid excuse for doing so, doesn’t make him a benevolent hero. All those MAGA streamers and political pundits you love to pine over and “vehemently, passionately agree with” are all a part of the same underground club and “Old Guard” that you think they’re opposing. It’s time to dump them all and get yourself and your head out of that space and out of your ass. These media personalities are all just Hegelian dialectic pushing actor-agents that operate on varying levels of the Controlled Opposition spectrum and who specialize in the exact kind of rage-baiting rhetoric that’s designed you keep you polarized, distracted and unwavering in your loyalty to one of the 2 political parties. This way, when even more legislation is passed to further centralize the Federal Government’s power vacuum, you are already on board and brainwashed into believing such measures are necessary to preserve your own way of life, personal liberty and the pursuit of happiness. No sane person would ever be in favor of granting the Government even more power than they already have. There is a reason they have their leftist actor-agents & Controlled Opposition take such asinine and polarizing stances on so many issues. Most of your average liberal Democrats never even imagined allowing schools to circumvent parental rights to allow for a 7 year old to take puberty inhibiting hormones and even get wild gender reassignment surgery, behind their backs. Who’s idea do you think that was? That kinda crap comes straight from the top and is come up with by both sides, in tandem, working together.

Are there a handful of pundits and media personalities out there that might actually be completely independent and autonomous-minded, free of external loyalties and obligations that would make their opinions questionable? Not really. Not with any kind of substantial following. Any “real” or “honest” and totally unbiased truth content gets censored early. They get their channels taken down before they are allowed real traction. I’ve had many Twitter, WordPress.com and YouTube channels taken down over the years. I’m not saying there aren’t some decent channels still out there, but it’s few and far between these days. You don’t really grow your following unless you pick a side unfortunately.

WHAT IS A GATEKEEPER?

A Gatekeeper is a prominent and persuasive media personality who uses their large platform, status and influence to:

• actively protect certain interest groups, political factions and the politicians within from negative attention.
• bury and/or dramatically spin particular talking points using elaborate mental gymnastics and circular arguments.
• proactively get ahead of the “narrative train” immediately following a psyop and mold public perception by manipulating emotions and pulling on heart strings.
• exaggerate and dramatize strategically planted news stories in order to divert attention away from the ratification of unpalatable legislation and/or any unflattering headlines about certain public figures.
• remain overtly partisan at all times, instilling continuous division by regularly demonizing the opposing party and routinely harping on the most divisive and enraging talking points and politically sensitive rhetoric.
• are almost always initiates and/or narcs: members of an intelligence agency(CIA, DOD,DOJ) and/or secret society(Masons, Boule, Shriners,Jesuit,Golden Dawn, Phoenix Order).
• secretly collude with “the other side” and work with the politicians from the opposing party behind closed doors to manufacture the deceptive psyops and Hegelian Dialectic discourse that dominates our societal communications substrate
• often will play multiple roles on the world stage, sometimes simultaneously playing opposing parts on each end of the political spectrum(duality, the twin system, as above so below, Baphometic inversion)

A Gatekeeper will first and foremost have a particular agenda that they are designated to defend at all costs. This can come in the form of both macro and micro agendas. An example of a macro agenda would be to defend the Trump administration and any current or prospective Republican politician and right-wing ideology as a whole. A micro agenda would involve defending a specific policy that already has or potentially could be implemented by the Trump administration or any other partisan Congressman, Senator or State official. The difference between a Gatekeeper and any political pundit who actually holds an unbiased opinion is that the Gatekeeper will defend any and all policies that are proposed and implemented by the particular faction or entity that they have been tasked with and hired to defend at all costs with no regard for decency or rationality. While the pundit who isn’t compromised is able to step back and make an honest assessment of any said policy. A stance that may in turn go against the interests and agenda of the political faction that they support the of the majority of the time and overwhelmingly lean towards. While the Gatekeeper will turn on the charm and use their exceeding persuasive aptitude to convince their followers to perform a complex routine of mental gymnastics in order to force the justification of what would normally be a reprehensible and nonsensical stance to take.

The Gatekeeper actor-agent will operate both passively and actively in their adamant defense of any said policy, administration, institution or political party. A passively Gatekept policy for example would be the steadfast defense of Israel and the actions they take to advance their own interests in the region. While the ongoing defense of Israel is still something that is done actively of course, it’s passive in that it’s been long assumed and is embedded within the fabric and tone of all the rhetoric put out and is taken for granted as a status quo and immune to being questioned. An actively Gatekept policy would be something new and different that has yet to cross the desks of the Gatekeepers or the minds of their followers and that requires an active campaign at that very moment to persuade in the intended direction. These are often obtuse and unusual scenarios that can be easily convoluted by the pundits. They will actively muddy the waters just enough to make what are often outrageous stances and sometimes inexplicable reversals in long standing peace agreements or traditional norms, somehow seem palatable and acceptable to their followers For those who religiously watch only certain media personalities and no one else, the pundits are the only ones in control of what information reaches them and how, so molding a narrative is easy for them.

The bulk of the opinions of many of the most popular Gatekeepers are mostly genuine and usually fair and righteous in both their nature and substance. However when their primary sugar daddy needs to be defended for the indefensible and/or dissident opinions need to be deflected or debated into a state of “ineffectuality”, these are the hired guns who come to the rescue and go to bat for their masters when the time comes. Using both their talents in persuasion and the influence of their large reaching platform to make it all happen. While some of these “Gatekept” topics are general standing issues at large that might relate to an overreaching geopolitical agenda, like the defense of Israel’s never-ending aggression and illegal expansion of settlements in the region. They are also used as “fixers” who swoop in and go to bat for all sorts of different policies and politicians that become suddenly caught in the crossfire for some reason and it’s their job to find creative ways to manipulate the facts and defend the indefensible at all costs. But as far as long standing “Gatekept” issue are concerned, Israel’s occupation of Gaza is easily the most prevalent paradigm to be universally, systematically and inexplicably defended by a whole army of Gatekeepers. A paradigm that becomes much less inexplicable once you realize that all these actor-agents have been bought and paid for by Israel. There are two types of “Gatekept” topics. There are the long standing ones that you hear brought up repeatedly like Israel, as well as the never-ending supply of new, spontaneous issues or scandals that seemingly come out of nowhere and the keepers are forced to come rushing to intervene and spin, on cue. Issues that at face value might sometimes seem either totally inconsequential and not something you’d think any time should be devoted to, or something that appears to be counterintuitive to the usual moral and political stances upheld by that Gatekeeper personality and makes little sense to you that they would be suddenly pivoting their opinions about. These are the ones that will stand out the most and expose these people for what they are.

Why would any conservative Christian be so impassioned in their support for a tiny country like Israel and so adamant about supporting their continued annihilation of Palestinian cities and the genocide of their people? They wouldn’t. So why are so many conservative streamers and cable news pundits so pro-Israel? Because they are bought and paid for Gatekeepers.

Why does Tim Poole have guests on his show who used the Charlie Kirk “assassination” as a springboard to advocate for more Federal laws when he said “[sic]we need to push for a new FEDERAL LAW to target this kind of domestic terror and groups like ANTIFA”. Pushing for MORE laws? Is he insane? We have a supposed conservative in Tim Poole, someone who is supposed to be anti-big government and anti-government interference like all conservatives are, inviting an obvious Federal agent(the “Jesse on Fire” guy) to be a guest host on his show and who’s riding the coattails of the right-wing rage about Kirk so he can peddle potential new Federal legislation? New and totally unnecessary laws that we know his bosses at the D.O.J. have been trying to get passed forever now, just so they can further interfere with the lives and infringe on the rights of American citizens for their own enrichment? No one is combating their fake domestic terror groups with any new laws. The Feds are the one’s who created all these “domestic terror” groups in the first place. But that actually all happened on Tim Pooles stupid ass podcast and he sat there nodding in his beanie as this steroid-headed undercover Fed pushed for the further subjugation of the American people in the name of a psyop on top of more psyops! Why? Because Tim Poole is a Gatekeeper.

Here’s the Gatekeeper playbook. First you capture their hearts and attention with logical and very persuasive rhetoric about 95% of the topics you speak on. At least at first. All so when it’s time to come out and shill for the topics you’ve been assigned to Gatekeep, stances on issues that represent the remaining 5% of the topics on your dockett and that might go against the grain of your usual logic and will intuitively seem “wrong” by your followers(likely because THEY ARE), they will just let it slide and won’t question it any further and will just go along with your rationale regardless. Why? Because they have come to trust and look up to you and your opinion that much by this point. They nod in agreement as you defend the President for a bunch of the bullshit that he just pulled. You tell yourself that Israel is the victim and that we need them in power in the Middle East to police the area. In your mind, Charlie is the smartest guy in the room and definitely knows better than you do. Same thing for Candace and Tucker. You will then find yourself parroting that stupid-ass talking point while out at the bar later that weekend and spreading around chicken shit arguments and toxic irrationality. This creates the kind of discourse that the 2 party system was designed to create. The left has their own Gatekeepers and the same thing goes on with their pundits and media personalities. So you end up with both the right and left deploying their brain dead followers out into the community parroting the dumbest talking points imaginable and spreading retardation. This is what creates a “Gen-Z”. Or at least is one of the main contributors towards the creation of an ass backwards and hopelessly destined-for-failure generation. The public school systems played the most important role in molding those little dummies.

THAT’S what these Gatekeepers on each side of the coin are there for. THAT’S what Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens do so well. Do you think that Candace enjoyed being forced to go on air and defend Trump for being the Godfather of the Covid vaccine? Of course not. But she did it anyway and did her job by at the very least calming much of the anti-vax storm that she helped to create up to that point, but did it anyway. And at a time that the President needed her to and it was the credibility that he had accrued up to that point that allowed her to successfully quell as much of the groveling as she was able to. It didn’t matter how laughable and cringy her position appeared to the small minority of those of us who see ALL this shit for what it is. So long as she shifted the narrative to a measurable extent, she did her job.

¹